we are not sub species Essay Example

we are not sub species Essay Example we are not sub species Essay we are not sub species Essay Essay Topic: Hilarious Candidates name: Ahlam Abdisalam Candidate number: 0004 Topic: We are not sub species Question: Teenagers deserve more respect than what they are given, Write an article expressing your views on the above statement? Date: 3/12/2013 Deference to teenagers The meaning of the word teenager is losing its touch with stereotypical Judgments made by adults mostly. The word teenager can be defined as someone who is in the ages thirteen to nineteen, not for someone to be going under any emotional traumas or identity crisis. By this hackneyed statement, teenagers feel as if they are sub pecies when they are Just on the step to adult hood I am appalled by the mentality of some that teenagers are all the same, wild people, if true then I guess its safe to say that adults are the same too? Im committed to making teenagers feel good about themselves and not that they are all alike, giving them a reason to do awful things. As the president of a local youth club, I feel its my duty. I consent completely with Lois McNay, the writer of the article Sub Species, a truthful piece of writing in my view, which gives Justice to teens. At the beginning of her piece she divulges that she doesnt seem to be undergoing any emotional traumas or identity crisis and that she might be letting somebody down. Here she is mocking those who stereotype teenagers to be depressing humans. Putting a label on all teenagers to having identity crisis or emotional traumas is meaningless. There is no evidence confirming this As a matter of fact it seems that adults derive most of their knowledge of teenagers from social media that portray spoilt teenagers, thus they end up confusing fiction with nonfiction. Even supposing that people have identity crisis it doesnt always concern adolescents, it includes adults too. Also emotional traumas are made by children to so why are they always restricting the problems to teens only? Most Judgments made by adults concerning teens are dominated by unfairness. Its hilarious how they assume they are experts about adolescents when they arent. She then moves on to a short story. In summary, one day an insurance man visited her six forms treating all the 18 year olds like complete morons. He asked hem what do we find under roads knowing the answer to be pipelines they responded by saying worms, moles and dead insurance men. She follows by saying if you treat people like idiots they act like idiots. This shows that the disrespect towards teenagers is so popular, everyone expects it. Besides, if all teenagers were to have emotional traumas wouldnt they have reacted to the disrespect towards them? They were mature enough to reply in a mature manner and give him a taste of his own medicine. Later on in the article she says that for many adults there is no uch thing as a teenager who doesnt like discos out of all accusations made by judgmental adults, this angers me most. I work with nothing but youths meaning I have more knowledge about the youth. Many of my club members enjoy being with friends playing games, dancing and gossiping indoors! Im not saying that there are no teenagers who like discos, no. Im simply saying, the same way that some adults at them only? If anyone is to go out discoing its entitled to the teenagers not to adults with so many responsibilities like my own. Recently, near my hometown a fire utbreak was caused by a mother leaving her children at home to go out clubbing. But her kids had been locked in when a fire had started. They then have the audacity to call adolescents irresponsible. Plus, most teenagers arent allowed to enter clubs and discos because of their age, but adults are, so the probability of teenagers discoing varies. Furthermore McNay shows her compassion to adolescents when she declares that some adults patronize teenagers because they are envious of their youth and because the respect they dont get from their peers they demand from heir Juniors I strongly agree with this point as to the fact that back in the days when present adults were teenagers they didnt have all the advantages that the at hand teenagers have now. Clubs, technology, parties, the lot! The difference is tremendous. This in my opinion is the root to all false and Judgmental allegations towards young adolescents. Some adults seem to be so in need for the utmost respect and because they dont gain any respect from their peers they demand it from their Juniors. Not every teenager will be willing to give you the supreme respect, ut adults dont seem to understand that not everyone is the same meaning you shouldnt staple all teenagers with the same sticker. McNay expresses the label given to teenagers about their personalities when she says Unfortunately teenager has come to connote things like selfishness, irresponsibility, and arrogance how can you stereo type such a large group of people to have these aspects? From my observation I have detected that the adolescents attending my youth club arent the slightest bit selfish! If one of them gets into trouble, they all take fault so that specific erson isnt alone; I call that sacrifice not selfishness. And for irresponsibility, many adults claim youngsters as irresponsible because they simply dont have as much of duties in comparison to adults so they enw that and choose to call them irresponsible. The adults that stereotype the youngsters feel as if they are superior over teens, isnt that a sense of the arrogance they use to describe the vulnerable among us? I contradict with McNays point that the word teenager should be abolished, but I plainly want the definition of the word teenager to have its real eaning, to be in the ages thirteen to nineteen because as she says a lot of people would stop making money like stylists or designers as the fashion icon in this century is the mistreated teenagers. Dont they deserve not to be Judged so harshly and to have a little more respect? I feel as if the present teens are being targeted on. Yes, they make mistakes Just the way every other human does, with the purpose of learning from them. The saying dont Judge a book by its cover fits perfectly in this situation.

The Voice of Greenpeace essays

The Voice of Greenpeace essays The text provided, titled Letter to Greenpeace Supporter takes shape in the form of a personal letter, for the purpose of finalizing a complete ban on driftnet fishing. Greenpeace believe they must succeed in their efforts to completely ban driftnet fishing as a means to preserve marine life. The letter is composed of statistical evidence supporting the authors argument that driftnet fishing is extraordinarily detrimental to the oceans ecosystem, and many of its inhabitants. The authors use of persuasive techniques such as the tones of intimacy towards the reader (A Greenpeace supporter), and compassionate positioning for the endangered sea creatures are an effective way to position the reader to seriously consider the danger of driftnet fishing. The text clearly states that driftnet fishing has, and will continue to wreak havoc on our environment and marine life. The argument presented by the author is irrefutable in order for the devastation to stop, drastic changes must take place. It cannot be denied that driftnet fishing is harmful to many more sea creatures than intended. ... Greenpeace divers and officials, who monitored the catch on the surface as the nets were hauled in, counted 1,419 tuna, five sunfish, six sharks, seven dolphins and 31 miscellaneous creatures. Vernon, L. K. (1990, April 15). The article itself states that in 1990, over forty-one million non-target sea creatures were killed by a Japanese driftnet squid fishery in the North Pacific, all from just one fleet in one season alone. Four hundred and six of these sea creatures were a threatened and endangered species. In 2002 - the year the letter was written - Greenpeace had been fighting against driftnet fishing for twenty-seven years, successfully banning driftnet fishing in Australian, American, and South Pacific waters. The authors argument against the death trap that is driftnet fishing is captivat...

Life Insurance Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Life Insurance - Research Paper Example , n.d.). The need for life insurance arises to obtain a form of financial protection against accidental incidents or deaths for which individuals are not always prepared. If insurance is ready, through payments of the premiums, then in cases of accidental deaths or incidents, individuals can be insured. Life insurances provide benefits for deaths or critical illnesses, for financial interests of individuals and family, for insurances at different stages of life, plans for retirements, loan facilities, as well as with benefits of tax payments (Why life insurance?, n.d.). The two main types of insurance are the whole life insurance and term life insurance where the whole life insurance offers for permanent insurance and term life insurance offers for insurance for certain terms or period of time (Magni, 2013). The present study discusses about life insurance with particular focus on the differences between whole life insurance and term life insurance and trying to determine which is be tter, also having an understanding of the relationship of the insurance with economic situation. II. Discussion: Term Life Insurance: Meaning: Term life insurance is defined as the policy of life insurance whose coverage period for the insurance has a set duration limit. On expiry of the policy the owner of the policy can decide on either renewing the policy or to end the coverage of the insurance plan. The benefits associated with such insurances are mainly limited up to the death of the policy owner. However in order to obtain the benefits of the plan, the death of the owner is necessary to occur within the time limit set by the term life insurance. If such time limit is passed and nothing happens to the individual, the owner does not receive any benefits from the insurance. Thus term life insurance do not provide with any savings from the investments that the policy owner makes for the insurance (Term Life Insurance, 2013). Universal Policy of Life Insurance: The universal policy of life insurance reflects that a flexible permanent life insurance is offered to the owner of the policy that requires the individual to make low cost protection payments to the insurer and also in turn obtains a savings from the insurance plan. Thus a cash value buildup is possible with the investment of this type of insurance. With the universal policy of life insurance, the owner of the policy is capable of using his interest that he gains from his savings in order to pay the premiums for the insurance. The universal policy of life insurance was initiated considering the need for more flexibility for the owners of the policy as the policy allows shifting of the invested money between the insurance and the savings from the plans. Premiums of these plans are variable and are divided into insurance and savings by the companies offering the insurances. Thus the owner of the policies is allowed to make adjustments between their payments depending upon the different circumstances tha t they belong to (Universal Life Insurance, 2013). Thus the most essential benefit of the universal policy of life insurance is its flexibility along with the permanent insurance it offers to the policy owners. It enables the policy owners to adjust depending upon their needs and conditions. Based on the policy, an interest is earned from the cash value of the insurance. This interest is based on the